Other options such as turn-60D LCD, faster fps, a second screen in prime time. However, 60D CMOS sensor and a similar T2i 6:00 pm, DIGIC four, the same measurement system (63 zones), including the final nine (60D, but any sort of a crusade against T2i) focused. Therefore, the image quality at high ISO noise performanceare basically similar. all contributions, such as dpreview.com, say the digital picture.com I know I have the 60D in a magnesium alloy case, there was (as in the 50D), but otherwise the picture quality really is. Therefore, if you choose other options for the first time price of $ 300 (the price difference of body weight each) scholarships. Otherwise, use the 50 mm F1.4 fixed focal length, the optical quality is comparable with large lenses.
If you watch sports, you can see in the 7D shouldframes to large high second: eight vs. 3.7, a lot of rapid development of the system: nine of ten points (all sensors-cons), compared to nine points (one type). approach to early warning system allows tracking of moving objects in AI Servo AF with the role of sport light. Indeed, if you get a complete picture of the upgrade plan 5D Mark II to stay on the approach to enter the system 7D 5D Mark III (which can not remain for him to leave again.)
7D is a common resistant magnesium alloyQuestion. Therefore, if you have a goal once sealed with the 7D is on fire, dust and rain. who share 100 percent and uses the pentaprism viewfinder (instead of a penta-mirror viewfinder) for the bright viewfinder.
The sensor has a similar but faster dual processor DIGIC four (T2i 60D vs individual), then, the image processing. but the image quality is very similar between these three cameras and can not be the reason that lead a better version. I think if you do not wantother options, additional funds for the lenses, such as 17-55mm f2.8 IS, 50mm F1.4 (worth it for me) update
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar